The Rabbit Hole..

30 11 2006

This blog is for me to collect my many thoughts, theories and data/ evidence about things that are happening in the world, most of which will affect you whether you like it or not.
It is usually discontent that breeds questioning of things and I have always been at odds with society, always felt that things are not right and could be better etc. It is in this state of mind that some may decide to start asking questions about things to see if they can improve on their lives. When this questioning starts, it does not stop as there are alot of things I have discovered about humankind that you would probably never think would be true if not for all the evidence there is. You just have to know where to look, how to check different sources and how to eliminate disinformation. This is generally quite difficult for people to do as the Internet has so much data in it. It is easy to be overwhelmed with it all and not know where to begin or what to believe.
The point it, it is not really about beliefs. It’s about FACT. You have evidence pointing to something, then whether you want to ‘believe’ it or not is irrelevent. I might believe I can fly, or ‘God’ will protect me as I walk into a lion enclosure but it does not mean it is going to actually happen. Probably because it is not reality.
I have noticed that people can have trouble believing reality because it may not match up with what they have been told to believe the world is really like, or maybe it is just too comfortable with their head up their own arse. It matters not.
To take the blue pill, close this page and only return when you think you are ready for the worst time of your life.
You want the red pill? Then save this blog page in your bookmarks and come back often.
One more thing, I will do my very best to always distinguish between researched facts and figures, and my personal beliefs on the subject. Forgive me if I forget occasionally. If you think something may be a belief and I have not clarified it, please let me know.





Surveillance chief says number plate cameras could be illegal

30 11 2006

The Home Office is reviewing the legal status of automatic number plate surveillance cameras after the Chief Surveillance Commissioner advised that they could be operating unlawfully.

OUT-LAW has also discovered that the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) advises forces that warnings about the use of the cameras can be placed further down a road than the cameras themselves and still comply with legislation. This could breach the ‘fair processing’ principle of the Data Protection Act which requires visible warnings to be placed before the camera location.

For the rest of the article, click here.





Show Me Your Papers!! Schnell Schnell!

30 11 2006


Taken from the NO2ID site.

F.A.Q.’s about the National ID Card.

What is an ID card?

The government is planning to establish a system that will involve unprecedented collation and monitoring of personal information. The House of Lords said the Identity Cards Bills name is misleading.

This is about more than plastic cards!

An ID card, as part of the National Identity Scheme, will impose upon every adult legally resident in this country, including foreign nationals, a card which will link to the National Identity Register, holding fifty pieces of information about each of them. The ID card itself will be the part of the National Identity Register (NIR) you will carry in your wallet.

This technology brings many pitfalls, including enormous cost, a one stop shop for organised criminals and intrusion into civil liberties. (More about the pitfalls of the scheme.)

Why introduce a National Identity Scheme?

The Government claims its decision to introduce its identity scheme is based in part on the fact thatmany countrues are starting to put biometrics into their passports. The decision to introduce biometrics into some existing identity documents has therefore already been made, and the majority of the population would soon be using biometric identity documents (in the form of passports).

But this is being used as an excuse for a National Identity Register (NIR), masked by the concept of an ID card. The NIR will store fifty categories of information about you, and can be changed or added to without your consent.

The Government has suggested that the Identity Cards Act 2006 will tackle a number of problems, such as terrorism, identity theft, illegal immigration, and benefit fraud. It has never explained how. NO2ID says an identity register and ID cards are mostly irrelevant to these problems, but they will restrict freedom, privacy, and civil rights for everyone.

Tony McNulty, the Home Office minister once responsible for identity cards said: “Perhaps in the past the government, in its enthusiasm, oversold the advantages of identity cards. We did suggest, or at least implied, that they might well be a panacea for identity fraud, for benefit fraud, terrorism, entitlement and access to public services. In its enthusiasm, the government had over-emphasised the benefits to the state rather than for the individual in providing a gold standard in proving your identity.”

Who will be eligible to have an ID card?

This is the same question as “Who is required to register for an ID card?”

Everyone over the age of 16 will be eligible for registration.

Anyone visiting the UK for more than three months will also have to register. (Though what non-residents will have to do with an ID card is unclear.)

What information may be held by the National Identity Scheme?

The Identity Cards Act sets out fifty different sorts of information to be held on each individual, these range from name, address and date of birth to a record of all the occasions on which your record has been accessed and by whom. The Act makes it possible to extend this list in the future, by Home Office regulations.

Will I be able to check the information held about me?

You will be able to check it, but not to change it if it is wrong. You are however personally responsible for the accuracy of the information!

The Home Office states that the Data Protection Act 1998 will apply to the NIR, so an individual will be able to see the NIR information held on him/her. But the Data Protection Act has numerous exceptions for information used by government.

The Home Secretary has the power to change information held on a persons record if he believes it to be inaccurate. He need not ask or tell the individual concerned.

When will the first cards be issued?

The UK IPS (Identity and Passport Service) says the first ID cards will be issued from 2008/09.

What are biometrics?

The Home Office says that:

“A biometric is a unique identifying physical characteristic. Examples include facial recognition, iris patterns and fingerprints.”

Biometrics is not simple. Biometrics is the science of measuring and statistically analyzing human body characteristics, such as faces, iris patterns, fingerprints, voice recognition and so on. Features of them are not always unique, and so biometrics works with the statistical probability rather than offering definite identification.

The idea is an added “safeguard” to prevent another person from using your ID card. A fingerprint is much more difficult to forge than a signature. But that relies on biometric data being checked every time the card is used. Each check against the national database will be recorded.

What biometrics will be used?

This is not yet certain. The Act allows the recording of any biometric. It is likely that facial image, fingerprints and iris patterns will be used. Other biometrics include retina scans, voice patterns, hand measurements and even ear shape.

How reliable are they?

Not reliable enough! The government’s own tests on a sample of 10,000 volunteers, including more than 1,000 disabled volunteers, showed that:

  • Facial scans worked for 69% of the “quota” group and 48% of disabled volunteers. That is three in ten of the quota group and more than half of the disabled who were unable to use the facial scan technology.
  • Fingerprints worked for 81% of “quota” group and 80% of disabled people, but was more successful for young people. Two in ten in both groups failed.
  • Iris scans worked for 96% of “quota” volunteers and 91% of the disabled group. Some glasses wearers failed the checks unless they took their glasses off.
  • 0.62% of the disabled group could not enrol using any of the systems. There are 8.6 million registered disabled people in the UK. So if the volunteers are representative, at least 53,000 will not be able to give a usable biometric.
  • Black participants and participants aged over 59 had lower iris enrolment success rates according to the study.

These statistics came from this BBC News article.

Will it be compulsory to have an ID card?

Yes.

Will it be compulsory to carry a card?

Probably. When these FAQs were first written, six months ago, the Home Office maintained that introduction would be voluntary. That was twisting the truth. At some stage it is likely that it will be compulsory to carry one, although this is not yet law.

In practice, once you need an ID card to live, you will have no choice.

Will my information be given out without my consent?

Yes, the Identity Cards Act sets out a number of different departments to whom the NIR will be available, including Revenue and Customs and all the intelligence and police agencies. The Home Secretary can authorise most of the information to be given to any government body if it is needed for any government purpose.





Last Night’s Nightmare… Human Extermination

30 11 2006


Okay so I’ve had another nightmare. I usually have bad dreams but nightmares are something else. I had intermittment sleep last night because of bad dreams, but this nightmare was so lucid and scarey that I automatically just woke up to escape from it.
It getting hazy now, as dreams do when you’ve woken up and begun your day, but it generally revolved around the end of society and the mass extermination of the public by Governments and Corporations.
It was very lucid, that’s why it scared the shit out of me, anyway I think it was in America somewhere, and me and some friends (that I know in the real world, along with some I didn’t know) were hanging out somewhere at some time in the future. I knew it was in the future because there were CCTV cameras and Loudspeakers underneath them all with other bits of metal that I couldn’t recognise. Plus there was a distinct atmosphere of extreme fear out in public, in the open, I remember feeling that.
Anyway like I said, hanging out we were, and all of a sudden there was an annoucement on all the loudspeakers saying there was an emergency, (this wasn’t unusual in the climate of the dream) and there was a local rally point that people went to. Kind of like a cross between an open car park and warehouse allotment kinda thing. So we went there and there were armed guards/ police/ army patrolling it, (again not usual, they were everywhere in the dream). Once we were all there (there ended up being hundreds of us from the surrounding neighbourhoods). The loudspeakers said we had to congregate into smaller groups, and we only had 6 seconds to do it or we’ll be shot…..
Obviously we did it, our particular group had about 30 or 40 people in it.
We waited around for a while, expecting to hear the dull sounds of explosions in the distance (as an attack was imminent) but there was nothing. I remember it being cold, people were huddled up together. I remember listening in on a conversation these two guys were having about something in their lives, can’t recall the details though.
Finally the loudspeakers boomed and cackled out that we should, in an orderly fashion, make our way to the new tunnel that had been constructed in that area. It went into the ground in a slope ending in this big metal door. People started moving towards it, and all of a sudden I got this really sick feeling like something was really wrong. I remember reading about things like extermination camps, governments wanting to reduce the worlds population by 85% things like that. (I have actually read these things so I think this dream was my brain putting it all together). And I started telling people not to go into the tunnel because it lead to an underground extermination camp. Some believed me, some didn’t, the guards were in the distance.
Then as I was trying to rally up support the loudspeaker announcement stopped, and everyone looked up instinctively. Then every pole (which had the speakers etc on the top of them) dropped this flag that rolled out and hung underneath the speakers.
It was a Nazi Swastika flag.
The loudspeakers crackled and started playing an announcement, but it was in German and I couldn’t understand it, the only word I recognised was Führer. It was a short message and it kept repeating. I then realised we really were going to be all killed.
We were boxed in and I remember looking down that slope to the people waiting patiently to be slaughtered like cattle, not believing that I could be right, while at the same time the realisation was scaring the crap out of me and I started to panic. I began to walk down myself and people followed me as I was thinking (well maybe I’m wrong, I really want to be wrong, I’ll go down there because I run away I’ll definately be shot by the military police.) But the closer I got the more scared I got.
Go down there and most probably be exterminated?
Or try and escape and most probably be shot?
The realisation that I was going to die either way in the next hour or so wasn’t a good feeling.
I finally snapped and looked around for somewhere to run, the guards were a little distance away and weren’t really paying that much attention. I decided that I don’t care about dying. But there’s no wall in hell I’m going out like a f*cking animal in a slaughterhouse. If I’m going to die I’m going to start some serious sh*t first!
With this new found anger I got more people on my side till there were loads of us, we quickly found was seemed to be an old fast food restaurent back entrance near there and broke in.
There were girls and guys there. I remember feeling ‘I don’t want these girls to die.’
I was a hurricane of conflicting feelings, and could barely think straight. I can’t believe how vivid it all was.
I got a girl to keep a lot out and everyone else proceeded to rip up tables to use as shields, I found a store closet that had mops and brooms. I tore the poles out of them to use as weapons, people tore the legs off of tables, trying to find something, anything to use against the scum outside.

Suddenly the girl keeping watch screamed ‘They’re outside!’ and we immediately looked around, I was in the line of sight of the passageway we came down and saw a guard coming down the hall shouting. He had his gun up. I didn’t hear what he said, I didn’t care. He was one of them and I had to take him out.
I picked up the nearest ’shield’ hoping it can stop his bullets, and a shattered pole from an old broom, and I ran at him.
He fired, the shield held fast. I ran faster. He kept firing, the sound was deafening, echoing around that small passageway.
I reached him and slammed him with the shield, he flew back and dropped his gun, I pinned him to the wall with the shield and smashed his helmet off with the pole, I then stabbed it into his face, killing him.
I picked up the gun, looked behind me and said to everyone standing there in shock ‘Are you ready to do this? To fight right now against this sh*t !?!’
They looked at me and said ‘yeah!’
I looked back and saw another guard coming. I fired at his head (they were wearing body armour) he dropped. I ran outside.
Then I woke up.
….. WTF!

So there you have it. This was quite theraputic typing this stuff out, I think I’ll do this for all my nightmares. Have a nice day. lol





Privacy International and EPIC launch Privacy and Human Rights global study

30 11 2006

Link to Privacy International World Surveillance Chart.


Each year since 1997, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and Privacy International have undertaken what has now become the most comprehensive survey of global privacy ever published. The Privacy & Human Rights Report surveys developments in 70 countries, assessing the state of technology, surveillance and privacy protection.

The most recent report published in 2006 is probably the most comprehensive single volume report published in the human rights field. The report runs to almost 1,200 pages and includes about 6,000 footnotes. More than 200 experts from around the world have provided materials and commentary. The participants range from law students studying privacy to high-level officials charged with safeguarding constitutional freedoms in their countries. Academics, human rights advocates, journalists and researchers provided reports, insight, documents and advice.This year Privacy International took the decision to use the report as the basis for a ranking assessment of the state of privacy in all EU countries together with eleven benchmark countries. This project was first considered in 1998 but was postponed pending availability of adequate data. We now have the full spectrum of information at our disposal and we hope to publish the rankings on an annual basis.





The Truth About Terrorist Attacks.

29 11 2006

Remember it is your right as a human being to question anything and everything that you feel you want to. You are a sentient being and as such should not be rejected or ridiculed for having thoughts that go against the grain or the mainsteam view. I personally choose to question the validity of the US and UK governments stories regarding the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and 7/7, respectively. I question them because the 9/11 story just happens to break the laws of physics, and 7/7 just doesn’t add up.

Government and ‘authority’ have a vivid and reported history of deceiving the public, whom they are meant to serve. The mere idea of a government conspiring to launch terror attacks on its own population for political benefit is usually viewed as the ramblings of a ‘conspiracy nut‘ and I have also had the statement followed by ’so I guess you believe in little green men hahaha’.

Please you silly little monkeys, stop mindlessly watching the stupid media controlled television with the misguided belief that it is actually there to report the truth to you in an unbiased and open way.

The powerful effect of television on the subconscious and non-critical mind has been documented, although not popularized of course as it undermines the media’s credibility that it loves to portray to the little sheeple.

Now onto Islam. Although I personally believe that the people who apparently committed these attacks could not have done so without the help or complicity of the respective governments (when I say governments I do not mean the entire system, just small groups within them). Anyway, I have researched Islam as well, and you do get people saying it has facist undertones and the scriptures speak of hatred of others and a holy quest to take over the world. These people are often branded ‘Islamophobes‘ and with that label, are promptly castigated and ignored and nullifying their ability to speak what they believe.

The truth about Islam is that it does loathe Western society, it does see as the overall goal to bring the world into the house of Islam. This is true. Islam is seen (by Muslims) as a way of life and a set of rules that is superior to any other on Earth. Islam is a totalitarian autocracy, the very opposite of a true democracy (which we do not have, and in the case of the US, actually has a state of martial law).

If you do not believe my statements feel free to email me and I will get you the relevent links. I will, in time post a dedicated critique of Islam, but this is about terrorism and really about getting you to open your mind and not rely on the mainstream media for your information.

I do not want you to just sit there and believe everything I write, I want you to go and do your own research.

Films to watch (for free). Watch them all. Choosing to not give them the time of day by saying ‘oh come on that’s bollocks,’ and not actually seeing the facts being presented shows just what a good monkey you are, and what a great job the propaganda machine and mind control operations have worked.

Terrorstorm.
9/11 Mysteries.
Everybody’s Gotta Learn Sometime 1.0.
Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings.
Illuminati: The Hidden Agenda for World Government.





The Iraq War

29 11 2006

An impressive roster of experts is assembled to provide a generally withering commentary on the quality of evidence and possible motivations of the Neo-conservatives who provided the momentum and muscle behind America’s venture into preemptive war. Among them are veteran CIA analysts and operatives, military officers, diplomats, politicians, arms inspectors, and U.S. and British government officials. The fig leaf of the possibility of an honest mistake on the matter of WMDs is stripped away; what is left is the stark and disturbing anatomy of deliberate deceit.

Watch this video here - from Information Clearing House.

The Downing Street Memos.
More here.





London Bombings 7/7 Information.

28 11 2006

Collecting data sources on the 7/7 attack.

Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings Documentary - Google video.

Simulations of the attacks were being run at exactly the same time as the real attacks took place. This is a classic tactic of false flag terrorism. Don’t believe it? Watch the evidence here. This also happened with military drills during 9/11.

July 7th Truth Campaign - The People’s Independent Inquiry into 7/7.

Were the London Bombers set up?

The 7/7 London Bombings: How to Set Up a Patsy.

London papers database.





The Rape of the Mind

28 11 2006

THE RAPE OF THE MIND: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing, by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Instructor in Psychiatry, Columbia University Lecturer in Social Psychology, New School for Social Research, Former Chief, Psychological Department, Netherlands Forces, published in 1956, World Publishing Company. (Out of Print)

NOTE: This work has been long out of print, last known publication date 1956, the World Publishing Company. Of course, the technology has advanced and the techniques have been refined, but the principles remain the same.

Click here to read the book online.