THE PSYCHOPATHIC SCHOOL

26 02 2007

THE PSYCHOPATHIC SCHOOL -The Failure of Modern Public Education

We live in a time of great school crisis linked to an even greater social crisis. Our nation ranks at the bottom of nineteen industrial nations in reading, writing, and arithmetic. At the very bottom. The world’s narcotic economy is based upon our consumption of this commodity; if we didn’t buy so many powdered dreams the business would collapse - and schools are an important sales outlet. Our teenage suicide rate is the highest in the world, and suicidal kids are rich kids for the most part, not the poor. In Manhattan, seventy percent of all new marriages last less than five years. So something is wrong for sure.

This great crisis which we witness in our schools is interlinked with a greater social crisis in the community. We seem to have lost our identity. Children and old people are penned up and locked away from the business of the world to a degree without precedent; nobody talks to them anymore, and without children and old people mixing in daily life; a community has no future and no past, only a continuous present. In fact the name “community” hardly applies to the way we interact with each other. We live in networks, not communities, and everyone I know is lonely because of that. School is a major actor in this tragedy, as it is a major actor in the widening gulf among social classes. Using school as a sorting mechanism, we appear to be on the way to creating a caste system, complete with untouchables who wander through subway trains begging and who sleep upon the streets.

Read the rest of this excerpt, here.





Gif’s To Download and Study

21 02 2007
Click on these and download them.




Google ‘planning total storage’

20 02 2007




Debunking the BBC’s 9-11 Conspiracy Files

19 02 2007

Visit this blog for a thorough debunking of the BBC hit piece.

On February 18, 2007, the BBC broadcasted an hour-long episode which it claimed would examine and answer the questions of the 9-11 truth movement. However, both the episode and the written Q&A turned out to be attacks on the skeptics rather than a true investigation. The public was presented with a heavily controlled and edited discussion, which was rigged in favour of the official story. Worse yet, propaganda techniques were used to portray the opponents of the official story unfairly. Techniques included: manipulative camerawork, personal attacks and a show which focussed on only the weakest evidence presented by the opponents of the official story.

The aim of this article is to address the inaccurate rebuttals offered by the BBC, as well as to analyse the propaganda techniques and reiterate the questions that the BBC failed to address.





Czech President Calls Man-Made Global Warming a Myth

13 02 2007

From NewsBusters

As the media, the left, and the United Nations become more and more strident about a supposed scientific consensus surrounding anthropogenic global warming, more and more dissenters speak out against the junk science involved in this mythology.

The most recent was Vaclav Klaus, the President of the Czech Republic.

In an interview with “Hospodářské noviny,” a Czech economics daily, Klaus made the following observations (emphasis mine throughout):

Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it’s a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It’s neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment.

I couldn’t agree more. Klaus marvelously continued:

Also, it’s an undignified slapstick that people don’t wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the “but’s” are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues.

The interviewer asked: “How do you explain that there is no other comparably senior statesman in Europe who would advocate this viewpoint? No one else has such strong opinions…”

Klaus answered: “My opinions about this issue simply are strong. Other top-level politicians do not express their global warming doubts because a whip of political correctness strangles their voice.”

Another interesting question: “Don’t you believe that we’re ruining our planet?”

Klaus’s marvelous answer:

Perhaps only Mr Al Gore may be saying something along these lines: a sane person can’t. I don’t see any ruining of the planet, I have never seen it, and I don’t think that a reasonable and serious person could say such a thing. Look: you represent the economic media so I expect a certain economical erudition from you. My book will answer these questions. For example, we know that there exists a huge correlation between the care we give to the environment on one side and the wealth and technological prowess on the other side. It’s clear that the poorer the society is, the more brutally it behaves with respect to Nature, and vice versa.• It’s also true that there exist social systems that are damaging Nature - by eliminating private ownership and similar things - much more than the freer societies. These tendencies become important in the long run. They unambiguously imply that today, on February 8th, 2007, Nature is protected uncomparably more than on February 8th ten years ago or fifty years ago or one hundred years ago.

Fascinating. Let’s hope more political leaders around the world free themselves from the current bounds of political correctness and join the groundswell that recognize this junk science for what it is.





Current Events

11 02 2007

There is an active movement towards increasing surveillance and monitoring in the UK and the US. Using the convenient excuse of ‘protecting you from terrorism,’ they are stepping up their expansion strategy.

C.C.T.V. is just the tip of the iceberg. How about your children being fingerprinted in schools without your consent? I mean, they need your consent to go on a school trip, why not when they are taking biometric data from your children?

How about the Orwellian idea of C.C.T.V. being expanded with high powered microphones and megaphones to bark orders at you?

I mean, what’s wrong with the Fed’s tracking every purchase of every citizen and storing it on a vast database?

Then because we are all suspects, it only makes sense to install X-ray scanners in lamp posts.

Then you have the ID Card next…

Once they have your biometric data, including your fingerprints, high resolution image of your face, your addresses, bank account details, social security number etc all link to massive databases, it doesn’t take a genius to see that C.C.T.V. could then read your face, match it to the image of your ID card and track your every movement. But to be on the safe side. How about a nice RFID chip?

Eventually, as you can read in here, the idea is to have the population microchipped. Yes, that means injecting an RFID chip into your arm. Like a dog. Still think it’s rubbish? Still think this isn’t happening?

Forget about ‘getting with the program,’ that’s they last thing you should do. Please spread the word.





Could X-ray scanners work on the street?

11 02 2007

X-ray cameras that would “undress” passers-by in a bid to thwart terrorists concealing weapons, could be coming to a street near you, according to reports. Aside from the obvious privacy issues, would such a plan work?

Leaked documents said to have been drawn up by the Home Office and seen by the Sun newspaper say cameras which can see through clothes could be built into lamp posts to “trap terror suspects”

This is how they operate. The constant ‘threat’ of terrorism (so they say) is always the reason for invading your privacy, stripping you of your freedoms and eventually enslaving you. (When you have no rights, privacy, free speech or freedom of movement, you are enslaved).





The brain scan that can read people’s intentions

11 02 2007




Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population

1 02 2007

Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller’s creation of women’s lib, and the elite’s ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society.

Full article here.

To watch the interview, click here.

Part One.
Part Two.
Part Three.