By Judith Moriarty
10 -6 -7

There are pockets of people, and the shadow people you meet along life’s way, who are baffled and confused as to why people today (family members - neighbors - local politicians, etc) seem so disinterested, apathetic or downright complacent concerning world affairs. Many today cannot name the branches of government, discuss the workings of our monetary system (Federal Reserve), the labor movement, the robber barons, the reasons for the various wars (throughout history), the civil rights era, the Constitution, nor the details of the various trade agreements (not discussed or debated in Congress) and how these agreements, are systematically bringing about the ruination of our country and causing (globally) a mass exodus of people from the land of their birth to strange lands and cultures. Forget trying to have a conversation on the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO, the Bilderbergers, CFR, or the various economic summits deciding the real business of the world.

Serious issues, such as the genetic altering of crops, sterilizing of seeds, our massive debt (growing by the second), our great trade deficit (imported junk), our decaying schools, our imploding infra-structure, autism, echoing factories, outsourcing of steel, textiles, information technology, manufacturing, absence of an energy policy, H-1B visa workers (others) replacing American workers, our medical crisis, the privatization of the commons, etc — all these and more are never discussed in the media or by those hoping to catch (already decided) the golden ring for the presidency.

Instead, the people are subjected to the buffonery and nonsensical round the clock reporting of ‘news’ on the antics of dysfunctional sports stars, panty-less rock stars, starlets, newspaper ads, car chases, OJ’s Rolex, murders, immigration riots, demands for more billions for war, or the locker room, the slapstick of Foggy Bottom politicians wallowing in name calling, or the ethics of a toe-tapping bathroom perversion. If that all becomes too much, there are 500 TV channels that will numb the mind into a fantasy world of sports, car races, sitcoms, prison lock-ups, wrestle mania, or loud mouth hirelings screaming their scripted abuses at each other or guests.

Caught up in a whirlwind of flags, ribbons, parades, elephants, jackasses, of red - white - and boo; the herd is manipulated into believing that a moneyed candidate (red or blue) will save them from their dreary, fearful, tumultuous, indentured servitude to the machine. Surely this candidate will deliver us from war, from poverty, from emergency room medical care, from illiterate kids, from rising fuel prices, from shuttered mill towns, bankrupt farms, moldy homes, and broken levees? But each time the disappointment grows more burdensome. The power brokers of global business, are not to be found in Foggy Bottom. They (the politicians) are mere props, though better cared for than the masses, but in reality powerless to effect change on a global scale. They are nothing more than mere middle management…beholden to the money-changers who support (own) them in their cradle-to-grave elections.

Perhaps the apathy and the anger from friends and family - when confronted with reality - comes from the fact that people have been dutifully conditioned (programed) these many decades through public ‘education’ and TV and have devolved into a servile, sniffling, whining, obedient herd of workers and consumers. They are nameless - non-persons, units, nodes, human resources, cattle, acceptable risks, collateral damage, victims, queers, illegal immigrants, activists, soldiers, heroes, prisoners, etc, all numbered and catalogued. I’m nobody, who are you? Are you nobody, too? Systematically, social engineering over these past decades, (government schooling - TV programing) has everyone compartmentalized and labeled. This is no mistake - only today it’s more blatant and accelerated than at any point in history.

School used to be an oasis of fun, creativity, learning, discovery, and encouragement by teachers (not change agents).

A child’s ‘career’ is mapped out today by those who have little to no idea (or training) in guiding a child’s future. Further, it’s none of their business. My youngest son came home (4.0 grade average) and informed me that he’d been told that he was best suited to become a ‘plumber or a postman.’ Now, there’s nothing wrong with either of these careers - if that’s what one chooses. But NOBODY has the right to choose a career for a naive, vulnerable child (whose parents may be inattentive to school programming). I didn’t happen to be that mother leaving my child’s future in the hands of strangers.

At age 21 - I presented my son with the gift of a postal jacket that I’d found in a thrift store when he received his first Master’s degree from Yale. Even then he wasn’t sure about his career path. It is the fault of parents that this nonsense is going on in schools. Children are being terrorized by invading police (with dogs), explicit (indescribable) sex education, group think, Ritalin (other psychotropic drugs), testing in place of teaching, zero tolerance etc. (Not to mention the continual exposure to illegal (non-sanctioned and taxed) street drugs of many kinds.) Why are children unable to read or do math upon graduation? Why are they quitting school? Why can’t they write a coherent essay (paragraph?) upon graduation, find a word in the dictionary, read literature, or count change? Maybe because there’s been a deliberate plot to dumb down America’s children…

Woodrow Wilson, president of Princeton University, said the following to the New York City School Teacher’s Association in 1909, “We want one class of persons to have a liberal education, and we want another class of persons, a much larger class, of necessity, in every society, to forgo the pleasures of a liberal education and fit them to perform specific manual tasks.”

Clinical psychologist Bruce E. Levine wrote in 2001 (Commonsense Rebellion: Debunking Psychiatry, Confronting Society), “I once consulted with a teacher of an extremely bright eight-year-old boy labeled with ‘oppositional defiant behavior disorder.’ I suggested that perhaps the boy didn’t have a disease, but was just bored. His teacher, a pleasant woman, agreed with me. However, she added, ‘They told us at the state conference that our job is to get them ready for the work world - that the children have to get used to not being stimulated all the time or they will lose their jobs in the real world.’ “

From The Memory Hole - Russ Kick, 2006 —

“It’s no secret that the US educational system doesn’t do a very good job. Studies show that America’s school kids lag behind their peers in pretty much every industrialized nation. We hear shocking statistics about the percent of high-school seniors who can’t find the U.S. on an unmarked map of the world. Fingers are pointed at overcrowded classrooms, lack of funding, teachers who can’t pass competency tests, etc. Those are secondary problems. Even if they were cleared up, schools would still suck. Why? Because they were designed to.”

“In 1888, the Senate Committee on Education was getting jittery about the localized, non-standardized, non-mandatory form of education that was actually teaching children to read at advanced levels, to comprehend history, and, egads, to think for themselves.The committee’s report stated, ‘We believe that education is one of the principle causes of discontent of late years manifesting itself among the laboring classes’. By the turn of the century, America’s new educrats were pushing a new form of schooling with a new mission (and it wasn’t to teach). The famous philosopher and educator John Dewey wrote in 1897: ‘Evey teacher should realize he is a social servant set apart for the maintenance of the proper social order and the securing of the right social growth.’ “

“In his 1905 dissertation for Columbia Teacher’s College, Elwood Cubberly - the future Dean of Education at Stanford, wrote that schools should be factories ‘in which raw products, children, are to be shaped and formed into finished products - manufactured like nails, and the specifications for manufacturing will come from government and industry.’ The next year, the Rockefeller Education Board , which funded the creation of numerous public schools issued a statement: ‘ In our dreams people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply.’”

“H.H Goddard a major architect of standardized testing wrote in his book, Human Efficiency, that government schooling was about ‘the perfect organization of the hive’. In other words, the captains of industry and government explicitly wanted an educational system that would maintain social order by teaching us just enough to get by but not enough so that we could THINK for ourselves, question the sociopolitical order, or communicate articulately. We were to become good worker drones, with a razor thin slice of the population - mainly the children of the captains of industry and government - to rise to the level (private schooling) where they could continue running things”. End quote.

John Taylor Gatto, former New York City school teacher (30 years) and school Teacher of the Year tells us in his book, The Underground History of American Education: An Intimate Investigation into the Problem of Modern Schooling –

“I had more than enough reason to think of our schools with their long term, cell-block- style forced confinement of both students and teachers, as virtual factories of childishness. Is it possible that President Bush accidentally spoke the truth when he said we would ‘leave no child behind’? Could it be that our schools are designed to make sure not one of them ever really grows up?”

“Many well known Americans never went through the twelve year wringer our kids currently go through, and they turned out all right. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln. Someone taught them, to be sure, but they were not products of a school system, and not one of them was ever graduated from a secondary school. Throughout most of American history, kids generally didn’t go to high school, yet the unschooled rose to be admirals, inventors, captains of industry, writers and scholars.”

“H.L. Mencken, who wrote in The American Mercury - April 1924 that the aim of education is not - ‘to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim is simply to reduce as man individuals as possible to the same level to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality’”

“Alexander Inglis’s 1918 book, Principles of Secondary Education, makes it perfectly clear that compulsory schooling was to make a sort of surgical incision into the prospective unity of the underclasses.Divide children by subject, by age, grading, by constant rankings on tests, and by many other more subtle means, and it was unlikely that the ignorant mass of mankind, separated in childhood, would ever re-integrate into a dangerous whole. The integrating function. This might be called ‘the conformity function’, because its intention is to make children as alike as possible. People who conform are predictable, and this is of great use to those who wish to harness and manipulate a large labor force (or military force - JM) “

“Once their social role has been ‘diagnosed’, children are sorted by role and trained so far as their destination in the social machine merits - and not one step further. So much for making kids their personal best. Schools are meant to tag the unfit - with poor grades, remedial placement and other punishment - clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior. People need to wake up to the fact that their children are being destroyed - robbed of their potential in these laboratories of experimentation on young minds, drill centers for the habits and attitudes that corporate society demands. They don’t want thinkers and leaders! They don’t want artists - writers - poets. Mandatory education serves children only incidentally. Genius is as common as dirt - if David Farragut could take command of a British war-ship as a pre-teen, if Thomas Edison could publish a broadsheet at the age of 12, if Ben Franklin could apprentice himself too a printer at the same age (then put himself through a course of study that would choke a Yale senior today), there’s no telling what today’s children could do.” End quote - John Taylor Gatto. See also: The Six-Lesson Schoolteacher -
http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html

Zero Tolerance. Why parents would acquiesce to their children being treated as criminals defies all rational reasoning. Again, this is nothing more than forcing obedience and compliance (group think) and *fear* of authority (really mind control). These ridiculous rules sent forth from some educational mausoleum in Washington by hirelings are an effective way of controlling both children and their parents. Like those in our culture who have defined deviancy downward, school bureaucrats are able to use these rules to create new categories of deviants who must be ‘cured’ by the state if they are to function in corporate society (a thinking drone - an individual drone - is a dangerous drone). Zero Tolerance is another example (such as the humiliation and herding at airports) of the state’s violence against decent and law-abiding people. School bureaucrats (themselves mindless drones - just following orders) are making children who are no threat to anyone - suddenly think of themselves as deviant and potentially violent, and in need of ‘drugs’ or re-education by the proper authorities. This is all madness…something right out of Franz Kafka’s ‘The Trial’. Kafka’s main character (fear not, your child will never have this as a book report assignment), who was on trial, was never made aware of his offense, but ultimately sees himself as guilty.

The Wigget Factory or the military? What career will be ‘chosen’ for your ‘human resource’ (oops, child)? The No Child Left Behind Act guarantees recruiters the right to private contact information for all secondary school students, so that students may be contacted at home. Schools refusing to participate are quickly cut off from funding. Did you know - did school administrators make you (the parent) aware that your child can opt out? See:
http://www.afsc.org/youthmil/militarism-in-schools/default.htm

The truth about a child who is put on Ritalin or any psychotropic drug. Your child’s permanent record will have him/her labeled, and thus in future years ineligible for some careers he/she may choose. Most Ritalin prescribed is for children in the U.S. - and it cures nothing, zero. It is unimaginable that any parent would permit a drug to be administered to their child under the guise of him/her being ‘learning-disabled’ or ‘hyperactive’ without doing their homework as to the DANGERS of not only the drug itself but of the addition to that child’s government file-for-life of having been put on such ‘medication.’
http://www.ritalindeath.com/education/school-violence.htm

MORE compliance and obedience to authority (fear) behavior modification: Armed Men (automatic weapons-toting SWAT teams) Terrorize School. Think about it. Your child should feel safe, secure and protected in school - not TERRORIZED by police raids with the approval of school staff and administration. Unbelievable. Your Congressman voted this as acceptable (but not in private schools). http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/011106terrorizeschool.htm

The newest move is opening mental health (imagine) clinics in schools to diagnose and drug more children! Soon all with be labeled mentally-handicapped or ‘challenged’ to some degree or other. And such ‘diagnosis’ will be permanently entered in that child’s government file-for-life. http://www.teenscreentruth.com/

Finally - for all parents, grandparents and those who care about the health of our children (remember they only have us to protect them): The E-Files will give you all the information you need as to what’s happening in our nation’s schools. People comparison shop for a car - search for months for that perfect home - etc, yet leave the care of their most precious treasure (their child) to strangers. And it’s even showing up at pre-school age now. It’s felt that a child needs to be ‘indoctrinated’ at the earliest age possible - and parents buy right into this nonsense. My children never went to nursery school or kindergarten. Instead, they learned to fish, splash in puddles, climb mountains, visit zoos, explore, play, and enjoy being a child. They didn’t start school until age seven (when I decided they were ready) and were reading at the 12th grade level by third grade… http://www.e-files.org/archive/edition1.html

A dumb population is a controlled, shuffling, head-bowed work force (canon fodder) for corporate huckster criminals living lavishly (destroying the planet) off the labors of others with their own spoiled-rotten offspring educated to take their place. The fault, dear Brutus, lies in a people, a nation, who allowed all of this to happen.

Judith Moriarty may be reached at
jdthmoriarty@yahoo.com

As many as 95 per cent of CCTV systems in the UK are operating illegally, according to a CCTV expert. The revelation comes as new legislation is about to take effect in Scotland which could render even more systems illegal.

Companies whose premises have CCTV systems in operation must alert the Information Commissioner that they are gathering personal information about the people they are recording. They must also put up signs to warn the public that recording is taking place.

A new law will come into force in Scotland on 1 November requiring those operating systems on a contract to have a separate licence. The law, which is already in effect in England and Wales, does not apply to operators working directly for the company whose premises are being surveyed.

Bernie Brooks of CCTV compliance consultancy DatPro told OUT-LAW Radio that he comes across few systems that operate within the law.

“From my own my experience after personally surveying many, many hundreds of buildings, I would say probably less than five per cent are compliant,” said Brooks. “I would say that 95 per cent are non-compliant in one way, shape, form or another with the [Data Protection] Act. Obviously, that’s quite a worrying thing. If the system is non-compliant it could invalidate the usefulness of the evidence in a court of law.”

Brooks’s assessment matches that of non-profit CCTV awareness raising body Camerawatch. It said in June that its research showed that over 90 per cent of the UK’s 4.2 million CCTV systems were not compliant with the Data Protection Act.

“That has profound implications for the reputation of the CCTV and camera surveillance industry and all concerned with it,” said Camerawatch chairman Gordon Ferrie in June.

The new law in Scotland could push even more systems into illegal territory. The new licences for individuals is operated by the Security Industry Authority (SIA).

“If you operate CCTV equipment monitoring public or private space and you are monitoring members of the public then it is likely you will need a SIA licence,” said SIA head of investigations Jennifer Pattinson. “The reason for licensing is to remove the criminal element from the private security industry but also to improve levels of training and professionalism in the industry.”

People who work directly for the firm which owns the monitored premises do not need a licence. Pattinson said that this was because companies which directly employ security workers are likely to conduct the kind of thorough background checks that it does when issuing a licence.

The news that almost all systems are likely to operate illegally will raise questions about the effectiveness of CCTV.

The news follows the revelation last week that London’s dense network of CCTV cameras may not have an effect on the solving of crimes. An analysis of London’s 10,000 cameras showed that boroughs with many cameras had no better crime-solving statistics than those with few cameras.

Copyright © 2007, OUT-LAW.com

This is how the elitists, the private bankers, heads of academia and corporations think of the rest of us. They have taken it upon themselves to view the rest of Mankind as a wasteful virus which should be mostly exterminated (90%+) and the rest kept in perpetual poverty, fear and slavery.

This really is no joke. Why do you think my sub heading to this blog is what it is? Watch this short ‘information’ film. Here is a very good comment left on it which I shall publish here after the video.

Joe:

Yes all life lives within homeostasis, however, once the homeostasis becomes unbalanced, no new life can be supported by the environment, and all the excess life dies off. It’s a natural part of ecoogical biology: the reason excess humans haven’t died off is because there is no excess of humans; the effect we have on our environment is almost nill, and it is arrogant of us to think otherwise.
As for global warming; CO2 is 0.04% of our atmosphere and humans ( only produce 2% of emissions!)

I would have to say that this plan underway, and they are well on the way to ramping up the killing. The documentation on this is massive, way too much to post in one article, if enough people contact me, then I shall compile the FACTS on the matter ASAP.

A short example of the use of propaganda to push a viewpoint.

Today, on the BBC site I clicked a link entitled: Humans ‘causing climate change’.

I wanted to see what the latest excuses are.

What you find when you click on it though, is that it actually refers to a poll by the BBC World Service. Of course a poll is worthy of drumming up that misleading title. It is just another phrase connecting humans with global warming, keep up the bad work BBC or should we start calling you the Ministry of Truth?

So, unlike most, I actually started reading the article. It begins thusly:

Large majorities in many countries now believe human activity is causing global warming, a BBC World Service poll suggests.

A sizable majority of people agreed that major steps needed to be taken soon to address global warming.

Large majorities in major countries?

Here is the next line.

More than 22,000 people were surveyed in 21 countries and the results show a great deal of agreement on the issue.

Last time I checked my maths, 22,000 out of 6,500,000,000 wouldn’t be considered a majority of anything.

Actually, it represents less than 0.0003% of the people.

Hell, London has over 7 million people in it, they could have focused on London and it still wouldn’t be a large enough data pool to draw conclusions from. But I guess that wouldn’t be fitting into the globalism of the mainstream media would it.

Now, knowing how small that poll is, the question remains, why would the BBC publish this crap?

Well it’s quite simple really, they are pushing the global warming propaganda campaign and dressing it up as something else. That could be in polls, in interviews, reporting on the wildly inaccurate UN report etc, it doesn’t matter.

What matters is that the words ‘human’ ‘causing’ and ‘global warming’ are constantly seen together, they media knows most people won’t actually read the reports and do any maths, they’re too apathetic and they trust the media to be honest! Oh that’s hilarious!

Here are some articles on global warming.

Click here.

Remember, the mainstream media’s main task is propaganda. Don’t be distracted by the bright colours, orchestral soundtracks and pretty newsreaders.

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it” - Adolf Hitler

From the BBC.

The study by a Cambridge University engineer demonstrates that once the collapse of the twin towers began, it was destined to be rapid and total.

One of many conspiracy theories proposes that the buildings came down in a manner consistent with a “controlled demolition”.

Many conspiracy theories? It is the main scientific theory thank you.

The new data shows this is not needed to explain the way the towers fell.

Over 2,800 people were killed in the devastating attacks on New York.

Thanks for reminding us. A refreshing dose of trauma, anyone?

After reviewing television footage of the Trade Center’s destruction, engineers had proposed the idea of “progressive collapse” to explain the way the twin towers disintegrated on 11 September 2001.

Which has been thoroughly researched, here. And by the way, since when did buildings have enough energy to collapse at free-fall speed, eject 80% of its mass hundreds of yards away (exploding) and also disintegrate the vast majority of matter in the buildings, that is, to dust?

This mode of structural failure describes the way the building fell straight down rather than toppling, with each successive floor crushing the one beneath (an effect called “pancaking”).

Dr Keith Seffen set out to test mathematically whether this chain reaction really could explain what happened in Lower Manhattan six years ago. The findings are published in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

Previous studies have tended to focus on the initial stages of collapse, showing that there was an initial, localised failure around the aircraft impact zones, and that this probably led to the progressive collapse of both structures.

Once the collapse began, it was destined to be “rapid and total” In other words, the damaged parts of the tower were bound to fall down, but it was not clear why the undamaged building should have offered little resistance to these falling parts.

“The initiation part has been quantified by many people; but no one had put numbers on the progressive collapse,” Dr Seffen told the BBC News website.

Dr Seffen was able to calculate the “residual capacity” of the undamaged building: that is, simply speaking, the ability of the undamaged structure to resist or comply with collapse.

His calculations suggest the residual capacity of the north and south towers was limited, and that once the collapse was set in motion, it would take only nine seconds for the building to go down.

This is just a little longer than a free-falling coin, dropped from the top of either tower, would take to reach the ground.

‘Fair assumption’

The University of Cambridge engineer said his results therefore suggested progressive collapse was “a fair assumption in terms of how the building fell”.

“One thing that confounded engineers was how falling parts of the structure ploughed through undamaged building beneath and brought the towers down so quickly,” said Dr Seffen.

The south tower of the World Trade Center collapses, AP Conspiracy theorists see evidence of a “controlled detonation” He added that his calculations showed this was a “very ordinary thing to happen” and that no other intervention, such as explosive charges laid inside the building, was needed to explain the behaviour of the buildings.

That’s why it happened when the Empire State Building was hit by a plane, and all the other buildings that have caught fire have also exploded and collapsed into dust.

The controlled detonation idea, espoused on several internet websites, asserts that the manner of collapse is consistent with synchronised rows of explosives going off inside the World Trade Center.

Several internet websites eh. Would make one think this whole 9/11 truth movement is limited to some nutjobs in a basement!

Zogby Poll Finds Over 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation

That’s a lot of basements…

This would have generated a demolition wave that explained the speed, uniformity and similarity between the collapses of both towers.

Conspiracy theorists assert that these explosive “squibs” can actually be seen going off in photos and video footage of the collapse. These appear as ejections of gas and debris from the sides of the building, well below the descending rubble.

Other observers say this could be explained by debris falling down lift shafts and impacting on lower floors during the collapse.

Would it explain the explosions reported in the buildings before and during the impacts?

William Rodriguez account summary.
9/11 Commission Ignored Firefighter’s Account of Explosions Inside WTC
And for intense fires weakening the structure…

Officials put the time of the outbreak of the fire at 4pm and said that was extinguished by about 6pm. The south tower of the WTC burned for just 56 minutes before collapsing, while the north tower lasted around an hour and 45 minutes. According to the official transcripts of the firefighter tapes, fires in both towers were almost out immediately before the collapses. Read more…

Dr Seffen’s research could help inform future building design.

Or they could just ask the BBC, which had an amazing ability to predict the collapse of buildings.

You won’t get answers unless you are prepared to ask questions…

For the people wondering about CCTV, the ‘it’s for your safety, to protect you’ etc crowd. I have addressed CCTV here.

Like I keep saying, it is about watching you. About your state keeping tabs on your movement, location and behaviour.

Yes, behaviour, software has been developed that can analyse your temperature, body language and other signs, and use that data to predict your mood. And that protects you how exactly?

Do you really think if you pretend it isn’t happening, that somehow it will cease to exist? Talk about a weak, child like view of things. ‘I’ll put my hands over my eyes and it will go away.’

It’s also called head in the sand syndrome. Here is another article showing you the potential of this ‘protective’ technology.

Before you dive in, remember this. This is regarding China. China is a communist dictatorship. Not a democracy. They execute those who are in disagreement with the states’ policies. They enforce population control. The one-child policy that encourages families to kill baby girls until they get a boy. They harvest organs of those they execute and sell them to the West.

Now there are reports of the cannibalizing of these infants. Note that this isn’t confirmed.

From the article:

But now comes the latest occasion for these comments. Next Magazine, a weekly out of Hong Kong, reports that the latest delicacy in Communist-occupied China is the expertly prepared corpse of a baby. No, you’re not going crazy; you did read what you thought I just said. People in Red China now are cannibalizing humans. In China, you can even buy choice body parts from the hospitals.

The story appears in the Epoch Times, which says that Next Magazine got wind of it in Taiwan, where a businessman hosted a banquet. There, a servant named Liu from Liaoning Province on the mainland inadvertently revealed the cannibalistic practice and her intention to return to participate in it for health reasons. The Taiwanese women present at the banquet were horrified.

The magazine asked the servant to escort a reporter to a location where he could see a baby being prepared and she did so. The reporter saw a woman chopping up a male “fetus” and making soup from the placenta. The butcher told observers, “Don’t be afraid, this is just the flesh of a higher animal.”

Epoch Times says that on March 22, 2003, police in Bingyan, Guangxi Province seized 28 female babies smuggled in a truck from Yulin, Guangxi Province going to Houzhou in Anhui Province. The oldest baby was only three months old. The babies were packed three or four to a bag and many of them were near death No one claimed them.

On the morning of October 9, 2004, someone rifling through the garbage on the outskirts of Jiuquan city in the Suzhou region, found dismembered babies in a dumpster. There were two heads, two torsos, four arms, and six legs. According to the investigation, the corpses were no more than a week old and they had been dismembered after cooking.

Red China does have laws that prohibit the eating of human flesh, but it also has a law that limits each couple to only one child. The law is strictly enforced, and it motivates couples to kill girl babies until they get a boy. Second babies and so on are forcibly aborted. The result is many baby corpses that can be cooked and eaten.

Now, to the main event. I encourage you to read the article in its entirety. I will insert a selection of quotes here and add comments in order to explain the common elements between China’s actions and the UK governments actions.

China Enacting a High-Tech Plan to Track People - By KEITH BRADSHER

SHENZHEN, China, Aug. 9 — At least 20,000 police surveillance cameras are being installed along streets here in southern China and will soon be guided by sophisticated computer software from an American-financed company to recognize automatically the faces of police suspects and detect unusual activity.

Britain has over 4 million CCTV cameras.

Starting this month in a port neighborhood and then spreading across Shenzhen, a city of 12.4 million people, residency cards fitted with powerful computer chips programmed by the same company will be issued to most citizens.

Data on the chip will include not just the citizen’s name and address but also work history, educational background, religion, ethnicity, police record, medical insurance status and landlord’s phone number. Even personal reproductive history will be included, for enforcement of China’s controversial “one child” policy. Plans are being studied to add credit histories, subway travel payments and small purchases charged to the card.

Britain’s ID card will contain even more data about you.

Security experts describe China’s plans as the world’s largest effort to meld cutting-edge computer technology with police work to track the activities of a population and fight crime. But they say the technology can be used to violate civil rights.

The Chinese government has ordered all large cities to apply technology to police work and to issue high-tech residency cards to 150 million people who have moved to a city but not yet acquired permanent residency.

Both steps are officially aimed at fighting crime and developing better controls on an increasingly mobile population, including the nearly 10 million peasants who move to big cities each year. But they could also help the Communist Party retain power by maintaining tight controls on an increasingly prosperous population at a time when street protests are becoming more common.

Do you think it would be acceptable for your government (yours, as in it belongs to you, not the other way around) to maintain tight controls over you?

“If they do not get the permanent card, they cannot live here, they cannot get government benefits, and that is a way for the government to control the population in the future,” said Michael Lin, the vice president for investor relations at China Public Security Technology, the company providing the technology.

That is what this is about. Control, not protection. Or when they use the term protection, they mean protecting themselves from you.

But rising fears of terrorism have lessened public hostility to surveillance cameras in the West. This has been particularly true in Britain, where the police already install the cameras widely on lamp poles and in subway stations and are developing face recognition software as well.

…

Some civil rights activists contend that the cameras in China and Britain are a violation of the right of privacy contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

My emphasis. I want you to realise something. ‘Human rights’, ‘freedom’, ‘privacy’ are only concept like everything else. They can be taken away from you. It isn’t like the laws of physics. Just read history to learn of the atrocities committed. If the people allow it, they can be forced into complete slavery and nothing will stop them. You cannot rely on the concept of human rights to justify your apathy, you must be willing to fight for them. You must be willing to enforce those rights.

Governments want to track the population. They want to know everywhere you go and everything you do. They want to know who you talk you, what you look up on the internet, what emails you send, what food you buy, what films you watch. Everything.

The idea behind big government is unlimited power. They can only gain this power by taking that power away from the people. That can only happen if the people allow it. That’s what fear is for. To scare the population into giving up their liberties.

The government seeks control over the population by controlling the populations assets. In this technological age, data is power. (Knowledge is power). The massive centralisation of data will be further enabled by ID cards. Biometric data belongs to you. It is as private as the thoughts in your head. The government wants this from you.

Stop pretending that it isn’t happening.

Let’s see the global warming zealots bullshit their way out of this one.

Years of bad data corrected; 1998 no longer the warmest year on record.

NASA screwed up with the calculations, in a nutshell, well ’screwed up’ could be ‘deliberately distorted’ knowing these government organisations. Read about the scientific dictatorship, here, very interesting stuff.

Anyway,

NASA has now silently released corrected figures, and the changes are truly astounding. The warmest year on record is now 1934. 1998 (long trumpeted by the media as record-breaking) moves to second place. 1921 takes third. In fact, 5 of the 10 warmest years on record now all occur before World War II. Anthony Watts has put the new data in chart form, along with a more detailed summary of the events.

There is something of a continual debate here in the UK regarding CCTV. On one side are those who see the technology as a benefit, to catching criminals etc, they usually have had something happen to them, or know someone who has so it is a lot more personal. Otherwise they just use the ‘well if you have nothing to hide…’ argument.

From The Guardian:

Your private life on show to civil servants? More bureaucrats, local and national, having access to your personal information - through data-sharing and data-matching bet- ween government databases, through access to your telephone and email data, through the national database that will lie behind a “smart” identity card. Your health records on tap to researchers by ministerial order - your doctor can’t say no. Local authorities, even health trusts, able to put you under covert surveillance.

I am firmly in the ‘NO CCTV’ camp. The idea that the ever-growing parasitic corporate government and its equally corrupt subsidiaries have eyes (and now ears and mouths) watching almost every square metre of Britain does not encourage the concept of a free people. Most people who bleat on about CCTV have little or no idea about how prevalent it is, who has access to it and the potential for function creep.

I am going to address some of these issues now.

Prevalence.

Britain is now widely known as a surveillance society^[1], it contains 20% of the worlds CCTV cameras. Quite high when you consider the fact that the UK only makes up 0.164% of the planets inhabited space.^[2]

People say it lowers the crime rate. Well it doesn’t, the crime rate is rising.^[3] (There are, to be fair, a large number of factors involved when producing the crime rate, as it represents a reflection of the state of society in general, I will deal with this later).

The first CCTV was more or less useless, with low resolution black and white cameras so bad they couldn’t spot the difference between a globalist and a human being. But it accomplished what it was really intended for, which was getting the people used to being watched. That means all of us. By placing cameras all over the place, the weak-minded public were brainwashed by the government into believing it is there to prevent crimes against them, like robbery, rape etc.

In some situations it has helped with evidence, but that is almost inconsequential in the scheme of things. The psychological consequence of the people thinking they are being ‘protected’ serves to actually disarm and weaken the public. By thinking someone or something else will do the protecting, the people lose the ability of doing it themselves. This is part of a larger plan to render you, the people of the UK, completely harmless and infantile, ready to run to your daddy government for any little reason.

Your complete submission and reliance on the government is the big picture here. Part of the justification of placing ever-more CCTV about the place is the idea of ‘combating crime’. As I said earlier, crime is a side effect of anti-social social policies. Encouraging chaos and fear is part of the Marxist governments idea of becoming your ’saviour’.

It is the classic problem-reaction-solution paradigm. If you don’t know what that is, I suggest you read up on it as it is THE modus operandi of those who seek to enslave you.

So, now the ignorant, frilly entertainment loving, apathetic public have been desensitised to the point of attacking those who question the need or the real motives behind CCTV. the government is liberated to begin upgrading those CCTV with microphones and loudspeakers. Now they need to listen to your conversations and bark orders, 1984 style at you because you obviously cannot behave according to the state’s rules.

Remember what I said about infantilism? Now you need to be told to pick up your rubbish, you bad child!

And while they’re at it, you wouldn’t mind if they installed x-ray scanners in lamp posts to see through your clothes, who knows, you might be a terrorist. How about smart software to be able to judge and predict your behaviour from those warm cuddly cameras you love so much.

If you aren’t doing anything wrong how can you argue against them? It’s a classic excuse based on a a set of rules that have been arbitrarily defined by those who seek to dissolve your freedoms. They weren’t set by you or me. How about the idea of putting cameras in your house, in every room?

Oh you wouldn’t like that. ‘But my house is my private space, the street isn’t’.

No it isn’t, but the street doesn’t belong to anyone, or it belongs to everyone. It sure as hell doesn’t belong to the government so what makes you think it’s okay for them to drench the country in CCTV? How about if private companies starting putting them up on every street, selling the data they’re collecting on you. Using it to judge your shopping habits so they can market more crap to you maybe?

By the way, I almost forgot. Just because the state administers the cameras, don’t go thinking for one second that all sorts of private firms don’t have easy access to it.

What isn’t wrong with this picture?

Access.

From Spyorg:

Do you want CCTV images of yourself sold to broadcast TV and video companies, without your permission, and without paying any royalties to you ? Where CCTV images are used as evidence of crime, are there proper procedures to prevent unauthorised editing or tampering with the evidence ? Is it right that CCTV systems can automatically tag your behavior in a public place as “suspicious” ?

What are the criteria for removal of suspects images in facial recognition or video ID parade databases ? Are they entered for the duration of an investigation, or are you branded as a suspect for life, in the same way as DNA databases seem to be abused ?

Will the results of facial recognition analysis e.g. number of women, numbers of whites, asians or blacks walking down the street, be sold to marketing companies, or handed over to racists ?

How do you know these things won’t happen? Because the communist daddy state said so? Ah diddums, the government has already done back-room deals to sell the data it collects about you to private firms.

The fact that the government has decided that everyone needs to be watched all of the time should make you think.

Yes, think. Something you don’t do much of when you’re dribbling in front of the TV.

Think. The government wants to watch us all because it considers us all a potential threat. It wants to be able to watch and study our every movement, not because we are free individuals in OUR country, but because we are sheep in THEIR country. They have no trust of us.

But their job isn’t to trust us or not. Their job is to serve us. That’s it. Anything else they are doing has ulterior motives. It is that simple. You can try and avoid it all you like. ‘Oh the government wouldn’t do that, bleah bleah fucking bleah.’

You limp-wristed morons. Get a fucking spine. Unless you don’t mind being enslaved, with technology that can scan your face from a distance, track your movement through the city, link you with your purchases, spending habits, track everyone you come into contact with, analyse your walking pattern, see through your clothes, build an unbelievably detailed profile of you (which the state needs for what exactly, apart from selling it on?) and all of this to protect you? From what, terrorists? The same ‘terrorists’ who have the wonderful good luck of having this CCTV constantly fail whenever they were out there doing their alleged terrorist stuff. Seriously, 400,000 cameras in London and all over the Underground, and none of them were working?

Maybe if they were working they would have seen this:

Bruce Lait, in a tube carriage in which an explosion occurred:

As they made their way out, a policeman pointed out where the bomb had been. “The policeman said ‘mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag,” he said. [Cambridge News]

Maybe they would have been able to show the same things this man saw:

Which brings up something else about CCTV. As the government markets their public surveillance network as an infallible crime-rate smashing-super-good-great-thing (which never seems to fucking work when it’s convenient for the government), the people grow to believe in it’s ‘truth’ completely (that is part of the psy op). So showing one frame of so-called footage is enough to convince the public that whatever the police say must be true, they’re got a picture! Sure it’s distant and grainy, and actually looks like it’s been forged, but it must be true! I mean, it’s on the TV!

Think.

Don’t you feel safe?

They want to make us feel like we don’t need our freedoms so we won’t complain when the government takes them (for our safety of course). It wants to administer your life, your money, your freedom to you when it sees fit. If it sees you and the body language recognition software flags you as a potential pain in the states’ arse, it can just send the police round, or get more invasive surveillance put on you. Technically you could be a terrorist. What I mean by that is, someone who incites terror in the scum bags running this country. (Like those who want their freedom and their country back from the globalists).
There is only so much power in any society. Societies always begin with the people having it, as societies are built up around communities, and for those communities to accept the idea of a council, the council must agree to serve the people.

This current UK government is Marxist/ Communist. This is apparent in its continuing attempts to power grab everything from the people, to control everything. Like I said earlier, it does this by convincing you idiots that you need the State to do these things because you can’t do it for yourself.

Wake up people, please. Time is running, CCTV is a pinprick compared to other issues I have become aware of. But you have you understand the State is dedicated to scaring the shit out of you, then attempting to portray itself as your friend as it swoops in to ‘protect’ you from whatever fear-mongering IT’S been doing to you. But you have to give up some of your power as people. Every time. Just a bit more here, a bit more there.

If I were you, I’d get MAD!!

CCTV Faq

‘We are waking up to a surveillance society all around us’

Liberty - About CCTV

Philip Johnston’s award winning article on the State.

‘Big Brother is watching you’

Erosion of London’s privacy.

Is CCTV Surveillance in the UK in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights ?

Homeland Security To Covertly Scan Behaviour

Britain In 2007
Sean Wallace

The Fucking Weather
The Fucking Fear
False Terror, False Flag
The Fucking immigrants And Their Extra Rights And Immunities
The Fucking Lying Corporate Media
The Fucking New World Order
The Fucking CCTV
The Fucking Hoodies
The Fucking Staffs
The Fucking Fake Clueless Selfish Self Centred Amoral Women
The Fucking Fem-nazis That Encouraged Them
The Fucking Lies
The Fucking Wars
The Fucking Global Warming Swindle
The Fucking Corporations
The Fucking Advertising
The Fucking Ignorance
The Fucking Apathy
The Fucking Control
The Fucking Power
The Fucking Politicians
The Fucking Government
The Fucking New Draconian Laws
The Fucking Loss Of More Of Our Rights
The Fucking Right Wing
The Fucking Fascist
The Fucking Evil
The Fucking New ‘Prime Minister’
The Fucking New-speak
The Fucking Politically Correct
The Fucking Orwellian Nightmare
The Fucking Infringement On Our Freedom Of Speech
The Fucking Inability To Criticise Our ‘New’ Governments
The Fucking ID Cards
The Fucking Database State
The Fucking Invasion Of Our Privacies
The Fucking Loneliness.

Welcome to this site. It has just been created and it being built as we speak. For now, just know this…

Your rights are being stripped away from you with each passing day. You are not free.

You are being kept in an inflated state of fear in order to make it easier to control you and distract you from what is really going on. Read false flag terrorism.

It has been scientifically proven that watching television induces something similar to a hypnotic state, wherein your critical mind (responsible for questioning things) shuts down and your primal, or subconscious mind becomes active. Hence the term ‘edge of your seat’. You are on the edge of your seat because your subconscious perceives the scenes being broadcast as real, this then filters into your conscious mind, bypassing the normal critical process. Yes, you could call that brainwashing.

Numerous testimony and evidence proves that feminism is actively promoted and funded by the elites (Rockefeller’s et al) in order to create divisions between the sexes, and as a consequence destroy the traditional family unit, which is the building block of a free society.

In relation to feminism is the Newspeak of Political Correctness, used by governments, the media and other self interested organisations to silence criticism of various topics while at the same time, promoting their own. For example, criticism of your country’s immigration policy brands you a ‘bigot’ or ‘racist’, criticism of feminism, a ‘misogynist’ etc.

We are living in the age of corporations. Through them, the elites’ influence spans the globe.

• Desensitisation to suffering, pain and war. (Prevents us abhorring it to the point of revolution).

• Acceptance of complete surveillance/ state-centralisation and administration of all personal data and morality. (Such as biometrics, movement, transactions, states of thought, concepts of right/ wrong, interactions).

• Total acquiescence to state/ United Nations control. (For our safety of course).

• Dumbing down/ encouraging infantilism of subsequent generations. (Lowers the chances of revolt/ independent thinking).

• Saturation by ‘entertainment‘ media. (Acts as a psychological distraction and promotes consumerism).

• Destruction of the family unit. (Using feminism, which also comes in handy for the next point).

• Depopulation. (They want to reduce the world’s population to 1 billion at maximum).More to come…